
Surely that gives them at least a half share, if not more in the rights to their preservation and celebration.
There's no need to be like that Paul.Red Race Tiger wrote:Martin,
Yes of course your right there, forgive me.
We obviously don't need a UK based F/B page after all.
..and the counter argument is that TAC would offer protection to new owners knowing that they are buying a pukka Tiger....and so it goes around and around and will endlessly.Red Race Tiger wrote:
Having a Tiger TAC'd is not problem to any owner of an original factory car, it's the car's that cant or wont pass that i feel sorry for.
Eventually NOT having a TAC on a Tiger in the UK will be a huge big negative slur enough for any potential new owner to believe that "It isn't real"
Mine is an Alger, you know that.garyv8tiger wrote:the main problem with the forum and tigers in general is it needs young blood to survivemlike most hobbies . but with the price of average tigers being circa 30k how many of the younger generation could afford one .
for me the tac debate was the most interesting ive ever seen on this forum
.and i had never seen the forum so busy.although it did go round in circles at times .
martin has you or someone you know been caught out buying a reshell?as you do seem to mention the main advantage for tac being so purchasers dont get an alger .